Solar Financing in the U.S. – An Intern’s Explanation
(Part I)

By January 28, 2016Blog

About the Author

The Basics of Solar Financing

Background

You might say the solar industry is doing well. There’s a plethora of statistics that can be used to back up this assertion, but the graph below may sum up the picture best. Installation prices are falling, adoption is growing, and public opinion is changing.

And for good reason. Climate change, rising world population, increased energy consumption, and pollution have created a greater need for clean, renewable energy than ever before. Solar power, while not currently as highly proliferated as other types of renewables such as hydro or wind power, promises to be the technology of the future.

The earth receives more energy from the sun in two hours than all human energy consumption in an entire year. This makes the potential electricity generation from solar literally hundreds of times greater than the potential for all other renewable resources combined.

It should come as no surprise then that the U.S. government has been attempting to spur the growth of the solar industry at home. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 was one of the most important pieces of legislation to that end. It created the 30% solar investment tax credit (ITC) which subsidized the installation of solar panels and jump started the U.S. solar industry down the cost curve. While there are still improvements to be made, in parts of the country solar power is already cost competitive with coal and natural gas!

How does the ITC work?

The solar investment tax credit (ITC) is the current mechanism chosen by the government to subsidize solar power. Generally speaking, under the ITC a solar developer will receive tax credits equaling 30% of the eligible costs of a solar project. This form of government incentive has given rise to a new method of funding solar projects: tax equity financing.

What is tax equity financing?

While new to the solar industry, tax equity financing has been around for decades. It has played a prominent role in low income housing development as well as historic building preservation. The gist of tax equity financing is that, while government tax credits are meant to subsidize certain infrastructure projects, individuals and corporations are not always able to take advantage of the tax credits they receive from a project. This is because tax credits can only be used to offset tax liability. For example, if a company installs a solar project that costs $100,000, it will receive investment tax credits in the amount of $30,000. However, if that company only owes $20,000 in taxes that year, it can only monetize $20,000 worth of credits. This is where tax equity financing comes in. By creating a partnership between a company wishing to install a project (a developer) and a company with sufficient tax liability to monetize tax credits from the project (a tax equity investor), tax equity financing is born.

How does tax equity financing work?

There are three basic structures that can be used in a tax equity financing deal: sale lease-back, partnership flip, and lease pass through (also known as an inverted lease). The specific differences between the three are not important for the purposes of this article, but it is important to understand that the tradeoffs associated with choosing one over the other are related to the idea of flexibility versus complexity. Increased flexibility allows the partners to allocate project benefits (revenue from sale of electricity, tax credits, other incentives, etc.) to the partner who can best utilize them, increasing the value of the project. Increased complexity raises the transaction costs of the deal in the form of lawyer and accountant fees, reducing the value of the project. The goal of structuring a tax equity deal should be to strike a balance between flexibility and complexity to optimize the benefits for all partners.

Read part II of this blog series

Leave a Reply