This blog originally appeared on Geographical and U-M blog, The Conversation.
By: Andy Hoffman
By Jmcdaid (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
Climate change appears to have joined sex, religion, and politics as an issue that people try not to discuss in polite conversation. Indeed, according to a survey by the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication
, two-thirds of Americans rarely if ever discuss global warming with family or friends. Those that choose to open up the topic will find that it sharply divides people along ideological lines. A 2013 survey
by the Pew Research Center
found that 50% of Republicans believe that “global warming evidence is solid,” while the corresponding number for Democrats is 88% (62% of Independents and only 25% of Tea Party Republicans). How did this happen? When nearly 200 scientific agencies
around the world (including those of every one of the G8 countries) and 97%
of the 11,944 peer-reviewed journal articles between 1991 and 2011 endorse the position that climate change is happening, why is there such an emotional and vitriolic debate over this single scientific issue?
The answer is because the public debate over climate change is no longer about science. It is about values, culture, worldviews and ideology. As physical scientists explore the mechanics and implications of anthropogenic climate change, social scientists explore the cultural reasons why people support or reject their scientific conclusions. What we find is that scientists do not hold the definitive final word in the public debate on this issue. Instead, the public interprets and validates conclusions from the scientific community by filtering their statements through our own worldviews. Continue reading
David and I stood in a small room in front of a special machine used to visually sort coffee beans after they are harvested and dried. We listened carefully as the machine’s operator explained (through our translator) that this machine ensures only the highest quality coffee beans are packed and sold.
Marvin, a small-holder coffee farmer, stood by and nodded in agreement. The sorting machine was the last stop on our tour of PRODECOOP, one of Nicaragua’s 10 largest coffee co-ops, and as we emerged into the sun from the warehouse enclosing the small room, I squinted, taking in the lush green mountain landscape of north-central Nicaragua.
With an end goal of helping farmers capture more value from the coffee they grow, we had come to Nicaragua committed to achieving a better understanding of:
- how small-scale farmers make money, and
- how entrepreneurs in the coffee industry are challenging existing business models.
by Santiago Bunce
This week we open a parenthesis in our 7 post series about the positive impacts of BoP strategies to take a look at cases where profits trump development goals.
So far we have argued that offering products and services in BoP markets not only provides profits for companies, but also benefits BoP consumers socially and economically. Here are the 4 previous posts in this series:
Social Enterprise: Understanding the Base of the Pyramid
The Business Case for BoP Strategies
Distinguishing Between Demand and Need in the BoP
Incubating Expertise: Fostering Partnerships within the Community
Here we take a closer look at why companies also have the obligation to promote social and economic development.
Ideally, profits and development intersect in a way that creates shared value. But this is not always the case. When profits remain the main driver for companies, the services and products provided may have limited or no economic and/or social benefit for the community. Continue reading
by Kristine Schantz
This post is an adaptation of Kristine’s Pecha Kucha presentation in Detroit, Michigan, November 29, 2014
I left for Africa at the age of 22.
What was supposed to be two years turned into nine, as I became increasingly invested in the unique challenges and opportunities I discovered around me.
Working in the field of community economic development, the notion of sustainability became a constant presence in my life. Continue reading
By Pavel Azgaldov
Morocco. Since childhood, I’ve associated the name with the taste of sweetest oranges. Casablanca. Marrakesh. Atlas Mountains. Berbers: All quickened my imagination. In my mind they were associated with adventure, luring me to visit one day. I recently fulfilled my dream, and my trip to Morocco was one of the most adventurous and memorable experiences in my life.
The chain of events was set in motion last fall when I was elected director of the Renewable Energy Case Competition, organized annually by the Ross Energy Club. During the case competition I met Pashupathy Gopalan, managing director of SunEdison in Asia; he proposed that I intern with SunEdison’s office in Chennai, India. I was to conduct market research on the potential of more than 200 developing countries for solar irrigation pumps, figure out the most promising ones, and prepare go-to-market strategies. One of the countries that caught my attention was Morocco. Continue reading
By Ida Kubiszewski, Australian National University
“At present, we are stealing the future, selling it in the present, and calling it GDP.” — Paul Hawken
Imagine if a corporation used Gross Domestic Product (GDP) accounting to do its books: it would be adding all its income and expenses together to get a final number. Nobody would think that’s a very good indication of how well that business was doing. Herman Daly, a former senior economist at the World Bank, said that, “the current national accounting system treats the earth as a business in liquidation.” He also noted that we are now in a period of “uneconomic growth”; where GDP is growing but societal welfare is not.
The good news is that there are several alternatives to GDP being actively developed, discussed, and used. One of these is the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI). Continue reading
by Jill Carlson, Jenny Cooper and Marie Donahue
Detroit Skyline. Photo credit: Andrew Langdal, Flickr
Cities across America and around the world are feeling the impacts of climate change, and in their long-term planning efforts should be incorporating climate change—both reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and adapting to the impacts of climate change—into their decision-making.
A key step in the development of such urban climate change policy—a climate action plan—is understanding how much greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions the city produces, and a baseline for these emissions. In other words, conduct a GHG inventory.
This week, Detroiters Working for Environmental Justice and the University of Michigan Center for Sustainable Systems published the first-ever comprehensive GHG inventory of Detroit, which was written by a team of University of Michigan graduate students from the School of Natural Resources & Environment and the Erb Institute (U-Mstudents complete Detroit’s first comprehensive greenhouse gas inventory). The GHG inventory will serve as a critical component of the work of the Detroit Climate Action Collaborative, a grassroots multi-stakeholder effort to develop a climate action plan for the city of Detroit. Continue reading